Thursday, September 20, 2007
Director Stephen Spielberg (God) had made a movie back in 1993 that stunned me and the rest of the world. The novel Jurassic Park by Michael Chriton was the story of a man named Hohn Hammond, who had created/bio-engenered living dinosaurs. The story goes on as a group of scientists,Laywers, and a few kids went out to inspect and tour the island that the park is on. Speilberg has put it on the silver scrren and did a wonderful job retelling the story of how the giant beasts got loose from their cages and created havoc amonst the park.
The main reason that it amazed me was because of Spielbergs decision to use CGI technology instead of stop motion claymation. This was a risky job because the computers of that time didnt have the efficent software they do today. In the end it worked out wonderfully and i give this movie a 200% rating. Thank you Stephen for poineering the wonderfull world of CGI.
Monday, September 17, 2007
Journal Numero Uno
"the mind of an adult and the judgment of a house plant"
Which i think did a good job of explaining the story without giving any details. If i had never seen the movie and read that post i would have thought these kids are nerds and have to do something stupid to be cool. ( basically whats going on in the film). But once again he starts to give away the plot and in my mind too much information. This would have been a good review if he didn't tell the story, so if I'm watching it for the first time i would know everything that's funny and going to happen.
"Rogen and Bill Hader show up as a pair of small-town cops who are no more mature than the high school boys, and they take Fogell under their wing as their best buddy. They have some of the funniest scenes." ..."Soon Seth and Evan will be going off to different colleges, and they know their friendship will never be this exclusive or intense again."
I mean what the hell is that? Maybe i haven't read enough reviews but you don't give the whole story, because then there is no reason to get off your butt and go see it in the theater.
This review only said some brief words about the acting/actors in general. Usually critics give paragraphs on the acting and the ability to capture the scene, but LaSalle only seems to mention that they were funny and other movies that they were in. This was more focused on the movie itself not the ingredients. "Michael Cera, who at 19 already has unique comic timing and a masterful, dry delivery."Overall i would say that this was very informative and insightful on the movie (specifically the plot the most) and if you like to know what you are seeing, before you see it, then this was good to read. On the other hand if you don't appreciate the whole movie being told to you then pick someone else.